![]() ![]() Dissections are also environmentally questionable since the frogs are preserved in formaldehyde, and students often touch these chemical coated frogs with their bare hands. The move to a virtual experience would certainly be welcome for students who find the experience of cutting into an animal inhumane or disgusting-I remember my freshman year lab partner fainting while we worked on our frog. In comparison, a student can dissect a virtual frog over and over and just undo any mistakes with the click of a mouse. Kerry Kriger notes that he has "a doctorate in environmental science and I've never dissected a frog in my life." He says the virtual experience is actually preferable because if a student accidentally snips something she shouldn't have in a real-life dissection, the project is wrecked. ![]() A George Mason University study also found that students taught with Digital Frog 2.5 learned anatomy and physiology faster and more effectively than students taught with traditional preserved frogs. But do students actually learn as much if they can't hold the frog and touch it? In 2008 the National Science Teachers Association approved the use of virtual animal dissection software and many veterinary and medical schools are making the switch. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2023
Categories |